Funding key to save tigers from extinction
The paper is based on a study led by the Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) and focuses on how much it will cost to stop tigers from becoming extinct. WWF helped to provide data for the study.
WWF supports the paper’s conclusion that there is a need to rebalance conservation efforts to safeguard the tiger’s last strongholds.
The study highlights the need to redress the balance of tiger conservation investment to focus on the protection of the last remaining core or potential core breeding sites used by tigers. For too long now, good protection and monitoring of the most important living areas for tigers has been neglected, and the global population has suffered severely because of the lack of good protection in these sites.
“The situation for the wild tiger is very serious now and we can expect to lose the tiger throughout much of its range before the next Year of the Tiger in 2022 if we do not urgently step up action to protect the wild tiger,” said Michael Baltzer, leader of WWF’s tiger programme.
The wild tiger population has fallen probably from around 5,000 in 1998, the last Year of the Tiger, to as few as 3,200 now. Given that projection, tigers could disappear from the wild in the next 10 years. Some countries such as Cambodia and Vietnam may have already lost their wild breeding populations.
Protection of these core tiger sites and other potential protected areas is fundamentally necessary to the future survival of the wild tiger.
The paper calls for the urgent and immediate injection of around $35 million extra per year to match the funding already provided by governments, donors and NGOs to protect tigers.
“Stopping the extinction of the wild tiger, is unfortunately, the greatest concern we face at this moment and therefore protection of the core sites and potential core sites is the most critical action required now. So the emphasis must be there as this paper suggests,” Baltzer said.
While this protection is necessary and fundamental to the survival of the tiger, extra funds and resources are needed to ensure that the habitats required for the population to expand are at least maintained (especially critical movement corridors), and to reduce the trade in tiger parts, WWF said.
However, the study did not look at the cost of these actions, but focuses on what is needed to halt the extinction of the wild tiger.
WWF’s goal is to secure the tiger’s future and double its population within the next 12 years. As such, WWF believes that several actions are need to protect tigers, including protecting critical areas, keeping wider landscapes intact, and eliminating the illegal trade in wild tigers as well as demand for them.
Investing in core breeding sites alone, as the paper suggests, could lead to tigers becoming trapped in small core areas and the chance for expansion gone forever.
“We therefore need to ensure the wider landscape is intact with adequate prey for tigers to survive. Action has to be taken now as habitats once lost will never be returned. While addressing demand issues is a much longer term solution, as it may take perhaps 20 or more years to change behaviour enough to have an impact, we also have to start now if we ever hope to achieve it,” Baltzer said.
Funds are necessary for a wider spectrum of tiger conservation work. The process to decide the actions and the balance of the investments is underway culminating in a Heads of Government Tiger Summit in Russia in November this year.
“Hopefully the funds and commitments to protection of the last tiger stands will be found, otherwise all other efforts will be wasted,” Baltzer said.