What would you like to search for?

Paradigm Shift: ‘Human Wildlife Conflict’ to ‘Human Wildlife Co-Existence
© WWF / Cara Brook
About the project

Paradigm Shift: Human wildlife conflict to human wildlife co-existence 


Using WWF’s human-wildlife conflict (HEC) safe system approach, the project will collate all the available temporal and spatial information on HEC events in the area, and if required collect additional information. Analysis of information should verify the factors that drive HEC in the area cutting across forest ecology, agriculture and other socio-economics parameters. Project will also take advantage of district forest officer’s SMART technology and integrate HEC to produce a digital data collection system to ensure availability of data for HEC. Project will support creation of rapid response team to attend to HEC events and provide services to affected households. The project will also enhance and scale-up the existing best practices and encourage local community innovations. 

Human wildlife conflict (HWC) is one of the biggest challenges affecting the conservation and food security in Bhutan. Conflicts are due to crop and livestock depredation and attacks on humans. Less cited but other important impacts of the conflicts are the hidden costs associated with guarding, forgoing activities due to fear, psychological disturbance, family disruption, livelihood and food insecurity due to crop and livestock losses. Between 2011 and 2015, about 500 domestic animals were killed, more than 420 metric tons of crops lost and 25 human casualties (http://www.kuenselonline.com/review-human-wildlife-conflict-strategy-say-foresters/). Government cash compensation for livestock killed by large predators (tiger, leopard and bear) was discontinued in 2013 due to financial unsustainability of the scheme. As an alternative to this, an insurance scheme called “Gewog Environmental Conservation Committee (GECC)” was initiated in 2009. There were about 40 GECCs operating in the country but were proven unsuccessful and are no longer functional now. Towards preventing HWC, electric/ solar fencing is the most popular measure in Bhutan. Although some information on economic losses exists in the country it is still difficult to accurately quantify the full extent of human and economic loss of HWC in Bhutan. This is largely due to the lack of a single national reporting system and database. Available data are either not on an annual basis or not accurately collected. While it is difficult to quantify due to lack of data, the loss of a single cow – the sole source of household income in rural areas – can have a devastating impact on a family. This is also true with the crop loss where average land holding in Bhutan is around 0.84ha (BLSS 2013) and income diversification is very low. No long-term solution to conflict crisis exists today because the main drivers of conflicts are still not ascertained.

There are just speculations and assumptions of push factors (like habitat degradation) or pull factors (like agricultural productivity) or growth factors (like wildlife population growth). No temporal and spatial data on conflict exists to verify these factors and visualize the real causes of the conflict in the area. Project will be implemented in Gelephu, Samtenling and Shompangkha Gewogs of Sarpang district, in southern Bhutan. Sarpang is one of the human-elephant conflict districts in the country and three gewogs have been identified as hotspots for HEC events. The three gewogs are in the fringes of park forests and close to Indo (Assam)-Bhutan border. The local communities primarily cultivate cash crops like betel nut, chilli, maize, paddy, and banana. Livestock rearing is an integral part of farming in the area and supplements farmers’ income and livelihood. Elephants, wild pigs and hares are the main problem animals that raid crops. Elephants take refuge in Bhutan’s parks as well as the reserve forests in international borders and migrate to cropland during the peak cropping seasons. Elephants damage both food crops and the cash crops inflicting economic losses and fear among the farmers. Besides crop, they also destroy village water tanks, pipelines, shelters and kill domestic animals.  

curve

Objectives

  • 1. By 2023, deteriorated wildlife habitat around the community is restored.
  • 2. By 2023, new livelihood programs including wildlife-friendly farming practices are in place and operational
  • 3. By 2023, applicable new insurance/ compensation proposed for adoption at local and national level
  • 4. BBy 2022, Rapid Response Team instituted and functional

Project Approach

Safe wildlife and habitat
A situation where wildlife does not interact with the people or their livelihoods. Law protects wildlife and their habitats. In some case situation also tends to contribute to local lives and livelihoods such as the ways in which wildlife can reinforce positive linkages through approaches such as: Ecotourism, natural capital valuation and PES, biodiversity safeguards in REDD and associated climate mitigation financing.
Therefore, project proposes to carry out the following strategies and activities:

Establish the understanding of the conflict
The staff of DFO, Sarpang have some knowledge on spatial, temporal, and social characteristics of HEC events in their district but full understanding of HEC in Gelephu, Samtenling and Shompangkha gewogs is limited. Especially, scientific knowledge on elephant herd size, movements and behavior, habitat carrying capacity, severity of conflict and attitude of conflict victims is limited. Current crop protection activities in the sites only include prevention measures (fencing, guarding, using scarecrow drumming, and use of fire) other elements of HWC management are either very limited or none.
Therefore, project proposes to carry out the following fact finding activities.

Rapid assessment of HWC
Employing HWC Safe System rapid assessment tool, the project will comprehensively assess the context of HWC in the 3 gewogs. Assessment, based on the criteria of minimum HWC interventions will then create the safe baselines and identify key gaps as well as the effectiveness of the current HWC interventions. The baselines will spell out how safe is human and their assets and wildlife and their habitats in the 3 gewogs, currently. Later, baselines will be used to monitor impacts of the project interventions.

Conduct detail research on all aspects of the conflict profile
In year one, project will commission a multi-disciplinary research into all aspects of the conflict profile in the 3 gewogs. The information on elephant behavior and movement pattern, nature and carrying capacity of habitats, spatial and temporal characteristics of conflict events, social characteristics of conflict victims, severity and impact of conflicts will be collected. A hotspot map will be developed. The data will be used to design and implement appropriate conflict management actions for the 3 gewogs and creation of baselines for monitoring effectiveness of management interventions.

Geographic Coverage

Gelephu, Samtenling and Shompangkha Gewogs of Sarpang district, in southern Bhutan

Partners

Divisional Forest Office, Sarpang, Department of Forests and Park Services

Implementing Partners

  • Department of Forests and Park Services